5 ms·
I'm thinking that we'd need an Originality Authority (like a CA), to act as the anchor. I assume anyone could just strip the cryptographic signature and then re
by kittiepryde 7y ago
I'm thinking that we'd need an Originality Authority (like a CA), to act as the anchor. I assume anyone could just strip the cryptographic signature and then re-sign it with their own signature, and we'd need an authority to prevent that.
Upload your content, request a key you can sign with, the OA checks against previously registered content in it's database for originality (I can only assume this would be as buggy as Youtube's algorithm is today).
- SkyBelow 7y agoIf everyday people are allowed to possess hardware that can sign images, it would only require someone feeding the fake images into the sensor that would be recording. Then, they would have a verified yet still fake image, which if anything would lead to more people falling for it. You could require that information about the recording also be included (gps, timestamp, etc.) but not only does that harm privacy, it means that when someone fakes it then people will trust the fake even more.
- cr0sh 7y agoI wonder if it'd be possible to "deepfake" the crypto sigs...?
- vokep 7y agoIt should be entirely unfeasible if its good crypto In order to deepfake it, a neural net would have to understand the crypto algo in such a way it could modify its deepfake input to collide with the original input's hash. Basically it would need to reverse the crypto to generate all frames that evaluate to a certain hash, and then find one that is mostly similar to the intended input. I don't think it will be realistic at all, if even theoretically possible.