5 ms·
Whoa, never knew that was a thing. I found FF's dev tools quite bulky and clunky in the past, but I might have to give it another go.
by joshschreuder 7y ago
Whoa, never knew that was a thing. I found FF's dev tools quite bulky and clunky in the past, but I might have to give it another go.
- King-Aaron 7y agoThat's the only reason I keep falling back to Chrome, the dev tools are just so much more refined.
- jchw 7y agoThe one thing I always liked about Chrome dev tools was the ability to introspect WebSocket frames. Last I checked this couldn’t be done in Firefox :( Otherwise, I have found Firefox dev tools to be fairly competitive. I liked the CSS Grid stuff they had around the launch of Quantum; it made it easier for me to jump into Grid.
- shoeboxam 7y agoI use Firefox personally, but develop with Chrome. I have a hard time getting stack traces from Firefox reliably. Oftentimes one of the following occurs on Firefox: There is no error, but the page won't load. There is an error, but the error message is generic. There is an error message, but no stack trace. When I switch to chrome, I always get the error and stack trace without any further code modifications. I make sure to clean up for Firefox in releases. But it's just impossible to develop without error messages and traces. I'm on Ubuntu using the latest stable releases.
- bscphil 7y agoUgh. Is this really still broken? I'm not a web dev but I remember having to switch to Chromium 6-8 months ago when I needed to debug a websockets issue.
- collyw 7y agoChromium and Opera have the same dev tools and doesn't tie you to chrome.