4 ms·
Considering that from what I recall Lynx doesn't execute javascript, it would have to be one esoteric zero-day
by jsty 7y ago
Considering that from what I recall Lynx doesn't execute javascript, it would have to be one esoteric zero-day
- onion2k 7y agoDownloading and executing code is only one way a browser session can be abused. At the very least you're giving away everything your browser (even Lynx) puts in the headers of a request. That's often a heck of a lot of useful information for an attacker. Lynx supports cookies too so it would be possible to track a user between sessions. I don't know how that might benefit an attacker but I'm not an attacker[1]. I think a reasonably paranoid approach like "Hackers might think of ways to abuse this that I haven't thought of" is best. Unless your job is to take a risk and visit a phishing site, don't take the risk. Even with Lynx. [1] Exactly what an attacker would say!
- BeetleB 7y ago>At the very least you're giving away everything your browser (even Lynx) puts in the headers of a request. Which you're giving away any time you browse any external web site. >Lynx supports cookies too so it would be possible to track a user between sessions. You're downloading cookies for most external web sites. If the worst you do is the same as going to espn.com, then reprimand people for going to any external web site.
- Scoundreller 7y agoBy default, Lynx prompts to deny/accept cookies for every domain.
- Rebelgecko 7y agoLynx has still had remote code execution CVEs in the past. It's probably a smaller attack surface than a regular browser, but far from nonexistent.
- greedo 7y agoIt's been over a decade since there was an RCE for Lynx. The difference between the attack surface of Lynx compared to a regular browser is several magnitudes. No code is safe, but giving someone grief over following a link using Lynx is security theater at its worst.