5 ms·
From this and other comments in this thread it seems you have failed these phishing tests as soon as you click a link. Is the assumption here that you are compl
by kaffeemitsahne 7y ago
From this and other comments in this thread it seems you have failed these phishing tests as soon as you click a link. Is the assumption here that you are completely pwned as soon as you visit an url controlled by an attacker? I can't imagine myself compromising company data/funds via a website where I ended up through a newsletter unsubscribe link so this seems quite unfair on the part of the phish-testers.
- Consultant32452 7y agoThis is exactly the case. If you click on a link in the fake phishing email you've failed the test. It does not require you to install anything, open an attachment, etc.
- Scoundreller 7y agoI was once at a place where the company homepage was owned. Fun times. Just starting your web-browser would exécuté some Java vuln and scareware you.
- fragmede 7y agoIf you think visiting a webpage in Chrome, or any other browser, even inside a VM, is totally safe, especially against a nation-state level actor, I have some bad news for you.
- agurk 7y agoWith that logic just having your mail client/web mail parse a malicious mail from a nation-state level actor is enough to compromise your machine.
- whenchamenia 7y agoIt happens all the time. https://thecoinshark.net/microsoft-email-clients-was-hacked-to-steal-cryptocurrency/ https://thecoinshark.net/microsoft-email-clients-was-hacked-...
- agurk 7y agoFrom the original article which that page links to [0]: The breach centered around a hacker getting hold of a Microsoft customer support worker’s login credentials; from there, the hacker could dive into the content of any non-corporate Outlook, Hotmail, or MSN account This is a security concern for any mail that an administrator can read, although it isn't at the same level as being compromised just through parsing an email. [0] https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwndwn/microsoft-outlook-msn-hotmail-breach-cryptocurrency-bitcoin https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwndwn/microsoft-outlook-...
- 0xffff2 7y agoYou would literally have to never click on any link that isn't 100% under your own control in that case. Yes 0-days exist, but if I'm in an environment where that level of security is necessary, why do I even have access to a web browser?
- mikeash 7y agoIf you think that just clicking a link is so dangerous that it needs to be a firing offense, then you should probably lock down the computers so that the browsers cannot view anything besides approved domains.
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoIf you are in a high enough position that nation states are burning zero day exploits to launch targeted attacks against you, there should probably be a security professional filtering your email. (This is also a situation where disabling Javascript would be very reasonable.) For the remaining 99.999% of the population, I really don't think opening a web page in an up-to-date browser is cause for concern. Certainly if that browser is also in a VM. People have more pressing concerns in their lives.
- tomjen3 7y agoA nation state level actor will always get in.
- 0xffff2 7y agoThat's exactly how my organization does it as well. I had to go to an incredibly asinine training because I clicked on a fake phishing link after verifying that the domain was owned by a computer security company that sold phishing prevention services. The link just went to a static "you could have been phished" page and a few weeks later I got an email telling me that I had to got to a phishing awareness training. There was no attempt at all to actually collect any credentials from me.