5 ms·
Under political goals of the removal of regulations and privatization, this will increasingly become the norm. Under private interests, you have no fundamental
by kevin_b_er 7y ago
Under political goals of the removal of regulations and privatization, this will increasingly become the norm. Under private interests, you have no fundamental rights because the writers of founding document of the United States didn't not foresee the level of control the rich and corporate would truly have in this modern era. It offers no protection against abuse by powerful private interests that it does against government.
- fuzz4lyfe 7y ago>because the writers of founding document of the United States didn't not foresee the level of control the rich and corporate would truly have in this modern era They did, that's why they limited the power of the federal government to interstate commerce and defence. It was later generations that decided interstate commerce means activities that take place in a single state[0] and that we should use legal trickery to get around the protections they created. [0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn