9 ms·
IEEE forced to ban Huawei employees from peer-reviewing papers
- anonymousDan 7y agoWow. That is crazy.
- rustacean 7y agoieee should transfer its registration to Switzerland.
- hlsblog 7y agoIt's good idea.
- yuankui 7y agohistory will remember this day
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- peter-m80 7y agoThat's insane
- lpcvoid 7y agoThis is just ridiculous. This goes way beyond what they originally intended with stopping suspected IP Theft or backdoors by Huawei. This is a black day for academic progress and research in general.
- itoutsider 7y agoGoogle Scholar or Wikipedia websites has been banned in China for a decade, Do you think this is ridiculous?
- rememberdeath 7y agoWhy is that a reason to ban academics?
- edwinyzh 7y agoThese Chinese gov did't intend to ban academics, but political materials. But since they value their own benefits much higher than the benefits of academics to the Chinese people, they ban all the things, maybe because it's not technically easy to just ban individual pages given the huge amount of the materials. That's a very bad thing to ban the free Internet access.
- atlith 7y agoHi all, For those who are not familiar. Google is indeed banned because the CHN gov does not want us to see political adversary contents. However, google is available in the University I am working at for accessing research materials, especially scholars.google.com. I guess you were right, politics are banned, but academics aren't
- lpcvoid 7y agoNo, that's not great either. That's the Chinese gov wanting to block knowledge from outside about political events, probably. This is something worse though in my opinion, since it actively halts innovation standardization which shouldn't have anything to do with politics.
- leereeves 7y agoWith all due respect to academics, banning political opposition is far worse. Freedom is more important than new IEEE standards.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- xucheng 7y ago
- Arbalest 7y agoI can't help but wonder, are educational institutions immune to this? Keep in mind that these are all corporations involved here.
- rememberdeath 7y agoI am sure there are academics who are employed by Huawei. Implementing 5G requires academics. https://www.huawei.com/en/press-events/news/2018/7/Huawei-Dr-Erdal-Arikan-Polar-Codes https://www.huawei.com/en/press-events/news/2018/7/Huawei-Dr...
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 7y agoIt seems that Huawei is the US hostage in the China-US trade negotiations. I wonder who the US company will be that China will decides to screw over in retaliation?
- powerapple 7y agoIt is. Although I strongly believe Trump was going to use Huawei card after the trade negotiation. By that time, US would have had a good deal, and Huawei is a step to gain a lot more. Luckily for China, he has been forced to show this card now.
- teh_infallible 7y agoApple, most likely. They seem like the easiest target.
- est 7y agoActually it's Boeing.
- orwin 7y agoBy targeting Boeing, they really are targeting FAA power over other national or transnational agencies. Can this cause repercussion on other US agency power? I know that FDA ruling is mostly ignored in western countries, and this do not impact any other US-based agencies, so maybe it won't have any other consequences. If this only impact Boeing the US should be glad. And Boeing deserve a slap anyway. Their decision killed more than 300 people and the people responsible won't really be impacted (as the marginal utility of the money decrease the more you already have).
- hema64b 7y agoI don't really believe Chinese gov will play the same card to obtain leverages for the trade war, or maybe the last card
- Shawn1234 7y agoI don't think my homeland can actually harm the US in the trade war. We only dare to verbally declare that we want to fight back.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- hongbo_zhang 7y agoThis is ugly
- wangii 7y agoIronCurtain V2.0?
- xucheng 7y agoOr McCarthyism 2.0.
- _iyig 7y agoFunny thing - McCarthy was right, in a sense: KGB informants were all throughout U.S. government and industry [0]. Unfortunately, he accused and abused lots of innocent people, so this fact is often overlooked. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/685lp2/was_joseph_mccarthy_right/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/685lp2/was_j...
- dougspencer 7y agoRidiculous and a laughable accusation. The page you referred to has nothing substantial. Both Rosenberg and Hiss are proved to be innocent quickly but lots of people became silent because of McCarthy. If you want to go back to the dark ages, go yourself. Do not put your insensible sense to all the knowledgable people here.
- _iyig 7y agoAre you challenging the fact that the U.S.S.R. had extensive espionage networks in the U.S. during the 1950s, including the Rosenbergs who were in fact guilty of spying for the Soviet Union? McCarthysim per se was horrible, but the fact remains that the Red Scare was grounded in historical truth. https://www.amazon.com/Venona-Decoding-Espionage-America-Communism-ebook/dp/B001PTHYCM/ref=nodl_ https://www.amazon.com/Venona-Decoding-Espionage-America-Com... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg
- echaozh 7y agoIf you hunt witches, there will always be witches to burn. If you try hard enough, any American can be a USSR spy.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- david6767 7y agoThe Chinese steal our Intellectual Property. They must be punished.
- lpcvoid 7y agoI'm by no means a friend of the chinese in a lot of ways, but that's a broad generalization.
- diveanon 7y agoWhich of your IPs exactly have been stolen?
- klez 7y agoIndustrial espionage is a thing most developed countries do, including the US. What makes China so special is that it's actually gaining enough economic power to make the US go at economic war with them.
- fay2133 7y agoCould you point out which IP has been stolen?
- Canada 7y agoThat's a step too far. What's next, a ban on even talking to Huawei employees? I mean, if you want to be absolutely safe from serious legal troubles right...
- orangeX 7y agoIEEE is just for US, not for humanity. It should be shame of that VISION—"IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity."
- DDWD 7y agoI can not agree with you more!
- astatine 7y agoStandards bodies, industry associations and the like are multi-country organizations. No single country should be able to prevent others from participating in such organizations. IEEE today and a few days ago the SD card and WiFi alliance banning Huawei seem to ignore the views of the members from the multitude of other countries who are also members of those orgs. Egregious violations of some written or unwritten code of conduct needs to be handled by multi-lateral institutions. For lack of a better organization, some wing of the UN perhaps?
- rememberdeath 7y agoJust wanted to add that IEEE is much more than a standards body. Lot's of conferences are held by IEEE.
- astatine 7y agoOh yes. I am an IEEE member of reasonably long standing and this just complicates things for everyone, particularly for IEEE chapters in other countries where Huawei may have a presence and are active participants locally.
- xucheng 7y agoIt gets more complicated when considering Huawei is also a major sponsor to a variety of research conferences, open source projects, etc. I wonder what is ACM's stand on this?
- Barrin92 7y agoIf the US intends to rile up the the Chinese population for decades to come, well I guess they're on a good path. Unbelievable.
- _iyig 7y agoThe Chinese government needs no help in portraying this, or any other propionate U.S. response to Chinese trade policy, as an “insult to the Chinese people” and an outrage. Seriously, they’ve done it with much smaller stuff. It’s basically Fox News all the time in mainland Chinese news media, with government scriptwriters. That said, I wouldn’t be surprised if Huawei got removed from the. blacklist as part of the ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations, a la ZTE. Trump has already publicly mentioned this possibility. I hope this comes to pass, as reviewing IEEE papers seems like a fairly harmless activity.
- Joakal 7y agoI don't understand, how does a BIS list prevent communication ie IEEE reviews?
- hank99 7y agoReally shame
- majia 7y agoWe need to kill Huawei first, with some collateral damages to others, so that Huawei cannot do bad things to us in the future, even though there is no evidence or court ruling that Huawei is hacking anyone at this moment. Last time it was Iraq's WMD/washing powder.
- Sylvan0000 7y agoThen you happy with surveillance by US gov everyday with Apple, Google, Amazon right? We feel happy when accuse others but never think about ourselves and the ‘ethical’ gov.
- hema64b 7y agohe's being sarcastic
- reinmind 7y agoThe best practice that proves academic reasearch can not be independent from governor.LOL
- twervle 7y agoLots of new accounts commenting here. Interesting.
- shameonieee 7y agoShame on u, IEEE
- shameonieee 7y agoshame on u, IEEE
- Pandaily 7y agothis is terrible :( https://pandaily.com/ieee-forced-to-ban-huawei-employees-from-peer-reviewing-papers/ https://pandaily.com/ieee-forced-to-ban-huawei-employees-fro...
- joe___ 7y agothat is a shame
- DDWD 7y agoI am lucky that I have not joined the IEEE as a member. In the future, I will refuse to be a journal article reviewer. I will not do free work for such an organization anymore.
- anfilt 7y agoI am not even sure they wanted to do this It might be action out caution to avoid legal repercussions. I think it's extreme, but I am not IEEE's lawyers. So let's not jump to conclusions about motivations.
- ezVoodoo 7y agoPolitics over academics. Such a dark day of human academic history!
- hema64b 7y agoShame. And if you google "ieee Huawei", you can still find several news like "celebrating the release of new standard co-operated by Huawei and IEEE" on the first page. Now their version should be changed to "IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization(under the guide of U.S. gov) dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of the U.S." In the past, even physical war accelerates the development of tech(most for weapons tho some could be utilized to daily life), and now politics are forcing tech to go reverse. Wonderful.
- WHSTW 7y agoFake News
- lnyng 7y agoSource from IEEE. Read the attachments about the policy details. http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg23427.html http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg23427.html
- haibo 7y agoIEEE is registered in USA, so it has to follow the USA's law and rules, so I think it's not an issue of IEEE but an issue of BIS, please try to figure out that.
- fengw11 7y agoIt is an issue of IEEE. It shouldn't be registered in USA. Switzerland is much better.
- haibo 7y agoUnfortunately, the fact is that IEEE is a native USE organization, and the rule and law have always been there for long time. We cannot ban them just because it currently face a Chinese company, And then agin, to try to figure out why HW is listed in the BIS list.
- ssnistfajen 7y agoCompanies domiciled in the PRC also has to follow PRC's laws and regulations (whether they are compatible with our values is another question). Using the same ridiculous logic we've seen throughout this whole saga, we can also conclude that IEEE is "literally the US government".
- haibo 7y agoWhatever literal game, law is law, and my suggestion is to try to figure out why HW is in the BIS list.
- Grue3 7y agoSo much astroturfing in the comments here. If only people who care so much about Huawei (for some reason) were just as outraged about Uighur concentration camps...
- klez 7y agoI don't think anyone here is saying China is perfect or that this is the worst thing to ever happen. People are just pointing out this is a ridiculous situation. Anyway, we can be worried about something and still consider another thing despicable.
- skankhunt_42 7y agoIt's such a shame and you can't even find any news report in English.
- Shawn1234 7y agoThis is ridiculous? Which country is the autarchy now?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- lvxiangyu11 7y agoLet me speak a joke "IEEE is an institute of technology and academia, not the flunky of U.S.".
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- randomblbl 7y agoIt’s so sad that academic world is polluted by the politics. Who benefits from this!
- contingencies 7y ago(Originally posted on dupe; re-posting here) With the ambient positive mood regarding the significant rise of sci-hub, open publishing commitments from academics and institutions and the correspondingly significant pressure on rent-seeking publishers, perhaps we will see parallel pressure extend to politically partisan or subjugated organizations until an open science free of such politicking emerges? One solution would be anonymous scientific publication and review. Imagine that: let science stand on science, instead of appeals to authority. The bonus with such an approach is that it simultaneously solves for various "isms".