3 ms·
Judging from the comments, the article mostly resonates with people who already know how the codec works, but it doesn't seem to be very useful to engineers who
by mojuba 7y ago
Judging from the comments, the article mostly resonates with people who already know how the codec works, but it doesn't seem to be very useful to engineers who, like me, want to understand it in a bit more technical detail. The author could have removed the casual conversation noise in the text (very annoying in technical articles!) and filled it with some more useful bits instead.
- jannemann 7y agoI enjoyed the reading and think that it is not a technical article rather entertainment. Maybe that is wrong too and it is both. Why should every technical article by definition be written in a boring language? For technical details use the terms and search them in your favourite search engine. There are literally tons of articles about every aspect of H.265.
- mojuba 7y ago> For technical details use the terms and search them in your favourite search engine. Thanks for lecturing me, but the article in question is neither too entertaining nor too informative. That was my point. Other than that, of course I can find better materials on the net.