4 ms·
> and only run slower for power reasons. And if there weren't power limitations we'd already have cores using even more GHz. So a solution which depends too mu
by acqq 7y ago
> and only run slower for power reasons.
And if there weren't power limitations we'd already have cores using even more GHz. So a solution which depends too much on having something running faster could be not too relevant to be even used in practice. That's why I pointed to that assumption, which is I think something which has to be understood before the solution can be considered usable.
- foota 7y agoOnly a small part of the system runs at the higher speed, so it's not a problem for the thermal budget.
- Dylan16807 7y ago600/1400 gates is so small. If that gave even a .01% boost it would be worth the energy. It's basically zero in the total power budget, even at a high clock.