6 ms·
TCO was also a big part of the marketing campaign of Microsoft against Linux in the late 90ies, early 00s. A big difference compared to one or two decades ago
by danieldk 7y ago
TCO was also a big part of the marketing campaign of Microsoft against Linux in the late 90ies, early 00s.
A big difference compared to one or two decades ago is that a lot of domain-specific services have moved to web applications. So, there are probably a lot of machines out there that are just glorified web browsing machines.
Also, the popularity of iOS and Android have made more applications cross-platform.
Of course, once Office documents or legacy Win32 applications are part of the equation, you can't really beat Windows. It is a common misconception that LibreOffice could replace Office. I use a Linux desktop and a MacBook and most of the Word/Excel paperwork that I have to do (luckily irregularly) does not open correctly in LibreOffice. Of course, it is an uphill battle for the LO folks.
- mycall 7y agoLinux workstations, Office 365 -- skip LibreOffice.
- wowtip 7y agoIn my experience O365 office web applications are no competition even for Libre/OpenOffice. Has that changed lately?
- DataWorker 7y agoI’ve switched to libreoffice from excel and find it totally viable as an excel replacement except for lack of vba support, but it has its own scripting language so even that isn’t a deal breaker. It’s just so much faster and less bloated than today’s excel.
- zepearl 7y agoUnluckily in my case Libreoffice Calc (using it privately) is a lot slower when using formulas than MS Excel (using it for work).
- loup-vaillant 7y agoFor most users, "replacement" mean it can open and edit Microsoft's documents perfectly. For some users, it even means the GUI is just about the same so they don't feel lost. By that criteria (which are real criteria from real people), the only viable replacement for Microsoft Office, is the next version of Microsoft Office. The only way to break out of this, I think, is for governments to forbid themselves to use proprietary software that was not developed on their own soil. Because let's face it, it's not really about money (especially not about short term money). It's more about national security, sovereignty, and freedom.
- ethbro 7y agoAnd for why that's important: business teams who generate business-critical Excel sheets never got the memo about good ideas from the software development lifecycle. And have been cobbling together undocumented tools to get work done for decades. Dealing with this at work now. And it's not like they're disinterested or incapable of learning, literally no one thought "Gee, what those folks are doing looks a lot like code." The biggest boost to interop would be requiring software vendors to release spec sheets for necessary software components and file formats... if they want government work. No more "It's too hard" or "We can't." You want the job, those are the rules.
- dragonwriter 7y ago> business teams who generate business-critical Excel sheets never got the memo about good ideas from the software development lifecycle. And have been cobbling together undocumented tools to get work done for decades. So, business teams invented the all-too-common version of agile development even before “real” software developers, without the disadvantage of ignorance of the body of knowledge around the SDLC, got around to it.
- nradov 7y agoThe Excel file format has been a publicly released open standard for years.
- 7y ago
- amaccuish 7y agoTry OnlyOffice. Works a lot better re compatibility with office files IMHO.