2 ms·
As someone who doesn't smoke, it's awkward to read these articles that assume inevitably of tobacco's influence. You can quit. We can quit. Sometimes I run in
by panarky 7y ago
As someone who doesn't smoke, it's awkward to read these articles that assume inevitably of tobacco's influence.
You can quit. We can quit.
Sometimes I run into a group of smokers that I want to be more involved with. When I mention I want to be involved but not breathe pollution, there is usually sympathy and a response that there are others interested in quitting smoking, too. Many organizations are smoke-free, and more organizations would be if more people spoke up to request a non-smoking option.
- throw20102010 7y agoSnarky, but poignant. However, note that there are many government funded programs to help people quit smoking if they want. The government doesn't ban smoking, but it does tax it to encourage healthier behavior. There is no such funding to help people get rid of social media, and there are no such taxes to push people towards other options.
- MikusR 7y agoThey tax it to get money from addicts.
- 1123581321 7y agoPlease don’t make posts like this. Additionally, what you describe in your parody is actually how tolerance for state public smoking bans became large enough to make it viable.