A better title would be "The Propaganda of Convenience": Consider the concept of tying in commerce: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce) https://en.

A better title would be "The Propaganda of Convenience": Consider the concept of tying in commerce: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce) For example you can buy a specific cell phone (the tying good) on the condition of also buying a contract with a certain telecom operator. If freedom is a virtue, then considering just the 2 products of this specific cell phone and this specific operator contract there should be 2 binary degrees of freedom, resulting in 4 options: 1. buy nothing 2. buy cellphone but no contract 3. buy contract, but no cell phone 4. buying both. Then the act of only offering the following choices: 1. buy nothing 2. buy both would be nothing more than false dilemma foisted off as "convenience", literally "coming together". It's nothing but connotation games.