4 ms·
Not sure what the other commenter was referring to, but to me it's amusing because Elite: Dangerous is a (somewhat) similar game that followed the opposite path
by radcon 7y ago
Not sure what the other commenter was referring to, but to me it's amusing because Elite: Dangerous is a (somewhat) similar game that followed the opposite path of Star Citizen: They started with an MVP, got that to market and have been gradually expanding on it over time.
- simongray 7y agoHow's that different from Star Citizen? They're also doing that.
- ssully 7y agoThe biggest difference is Elite is a released and playable game, and Star Citizen is currently a series of tech demos and promises.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y agoIt's currently a series of playable modules, not tech demos.
- michaelcampbell 7y agoOut of MVP, they have none of those 3, it seems.
- radcon 7y agoEven the most diehard Star Citizen supporters will readily admit that there is no game right now. Tech demo is the best way to describe it, as ssully already said.
- raxxorrax 7y agoThey just had the better approach: Fully releasing a game with a minimal but high quality feature set that gets extended over time. It is a great game for some people. If you want to try the first generations of VR, I think this game is the reference for that. They didn't have the marketing of Star Citizen, but were better in everything else they did.
- xnyan 7y agoCould you send me a link to a video of anything like Elite: Dangerous gameplay from Star Citizen?