4 ms·

This is assuming that the stated 74% number is true. Fool me once...

• saalweachter 7y ago
  If it's a fake number, it's an interesting choice. They aren't claiming to be 99% or 90% backed, which would be similarly disbelieved by the same people who disbelieved the 100% claim.
  • jeremyjh 7y ago
    Suppose the real number is 3%. 74% sounds pretty good as a way to soften the blow a bit. It would be best to let the air out over a matter of weeks than minutes.
    • saalweachter 7y ago
      I feel like there could be a lot of real numbers that are much bigger than 3% but still devastatingly low. 10%? 30%? 45%? Also, do they break down the composition of that backing between "cash" and "short-term securities" anywhere, and how many of those "short-term securities" are real assets like T-bills, and how many are unsecured debt that there isn't the money to repay? 74% could be a "real" number ... but it could still be the case that there is only cash to cover 10% of the existing Tethers, and the remaining 64% is loans to companies that can only repay that ten cents on the dollar.