3 ms·
I agree with the first part, but not with your conclusion. There is way too much litigation. Hospitals and staff are using defensive legal strategies-- obscuri
by amitport 8y ago
I agree with the first part, but not with your conclusion.
There is way too much litigation. Hospitals and staff are using defensive legal strategies-- obscuring docs, discouraging internal (written) investigation, delaying urgent treatment with unneeded consultation (to get more signatures on a decision).
IMO, there should be legal protection against malpractice lawsuits. Increasing the attack surface will not help with the core problem:
Doctors are over-worked, they are human and they make mistakes. The solution is to either enforce work conditions for doctors (and people die) or accept those mistakes (and people don't get money when they are on the wrong side of statistics)
- Scoundreller 8y agoSo who else should be untouchable? What purpose does suing anyone for anything serve? I don’t see too many doctors demanding to become employees (with far less personal liability) instead of independent contractors as they usually are. Getting the best of both worlds is asking for a lot.
- amitport 8y agoI didn't mean to say that they should be "untouchable". Only that they should be given some protection for some very human, systematic, (unavoidable?,) mitigating factors
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]