3 ms·
This feels like a snarky comment that is in direct response to absolutely nothing contained within the article. Care to elaborate on your point? I don't see any
by zapzupnz 8y ago
This feels like a snarky comment that is in direct response to absolutely nothing contained within the article. Care to elaborate on your point? I don't see any link to the argument proposed by the answer highlighted by the link, but if you have one, I'd love to see it.
- devoply 8y agoI read the article and found it insane that figs are not considered vegan because their natural reproductive cycle may lead to them naturally having a bug inside them... which is a natural part of that insect's life-cycle. Hence I felt the need to be critical of it.
- zapzupnz 8y agoIt states that some people mightn't consider figs vegan, however it then goes on to state how non-commercial figs, by definition, do not contradict the official definition of veganism as defined by the Vegan Society, and also denotes that commercially-grown figs are completely clear of the issue anyway. The article addressed the very thing about which you were critical with concision and clarity.