4 ms·
Then make it an opt-in. Companies should use the more "opt-in" method. Bundle it under "experimental" or "advanced features" in an easy to use page with a very
by BartBoch 7y ago
Then make it an opt-in. Companies should use the more "opt-in" method.
Bundle it under "experimental" or "advanced features" in an easy to use page with a very clear explanation of what each feature does.
- hotpockets 7y agoBut what if most people like it? I have to say I think it makes a lot of sense. If a high number of people I follow like something, you might want to show it to me too.
- ponyous 7y agoIsn't that what the feed is? Now you have 2 feeds...
- hotpockets 7y agoMy bad, I missed that this thread was just on the notifications section.
- ricefield 7y agoThat's kind of the point though - I had no idea this feature existed until they started pushing it to me. I think it's too much to expect users to opt-in to things. How would I have known to opt-in to this? Yet I am now much happier because they improved the UX for me. I think opt-out makes sense though, for users who don't a feature.
- zem 7y agoi can see no way to opt out of it either
- BartBoch 7y agoIf you put it on a single, easily recognizable, easily accessible page (all new features, etc.), then many users will find it. You can even give a notification when a new feature is added (as long as kept to a reasonable amount). Features that will go viral are worth adding for all, features that did not can be kept there.
- naasking 7y agoYou overestimate what people will understand from a technical description in a configuration option. Even if they were experimentally inclined, which most people are not, they probably wouldn't even notice the effect, particularly if not a new user. Twitter is a black box for most users. Twitter very likely did market research on its effectiveness for the target market they were trying to please. Probably that's just not you.