I'm not sure that makes much sense;forth is typically a thin layer over a machine (historically physical, but also a VM, like the jvm) - so it'd generally make

I'm not sure that makes much sense;forth is typically a thin layer over a machine (historically physical, but also a VM, like the jvm) - so it'd generally make sense to implement the "compiler" is "assembler" (whatever that means for a given "machine")? A forth in forth that is a cross compiler or something, doesn't quite "feel" like a forth system? See also: https://www.forth.com/starting-forth/11-forth-compiler-defining-words/ https://www.forth.com/starting-forth/11-forth-compiler-defin...