6 ms·
NASA 'alien life' announcement leaked
- ljf 16y agoWhich marries with the speculation from yesterday: http://skymania.com/wp/2010/11/alien-life-form-is-here-on-earth.html/ http://skymania.com/wp/2010/11/alien-life-form-is-here-on-ea... (Previous discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1957823 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1957823 )
- ljf 16y agoThe live announcement will be viewable here: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html
- ryandvm 16y agoDoes Julian Assange have no limits? [I'm saving my insightful commentary on extraterrestrial life for the Hacker News post after the press conference...]
- kiiski 16y agoWhat does Julian Assange have to do with this? I didn't see any mention of him or wikileaks in the article.
- jcsalterego 16y agoJokes!
- cypherpunks01 16y agoThe joke being that Assange leaked the announcement before the press conference, if that wasn't clear enough... : )
- ericb 16y agoIf this is true, life evolving twice right here would have implications for what we would plug into the Drake equation, and make the deafening silence so far even a bit more eerie. edit: It sounded like a separate evolutionary path initially before the actual announcement--that is what I was saying "if this is true" about.
- JabavuAdams 16y agoWhy would we expect anything other than silence? The universe is big, but time is long. The chances of two active technological species overlapping in time is pretty low. I'd expect to find a lot of ruins and artifacts out there.
- ceejayoz 16y ago> The chances of two active technological species overlapping in time is pretty low. There are some pretty big assumptions about how long a technological species lasts in that statement.
- sfphotoarts 16y ago... and likely accurate assumptions, if the last 100 years is anything to go on.
- ceejayoz 16y agoThere are lots of alternative explanations proposed. Quick transitions into more advanced, less detectable communication technologies, for example.
- JabavuAdams 16y agoOr less detectable life-forms. I.e. we're wired to ascribe intelligence to human-like intelligence. Something radically different or developed might not look like intelligence to us. E.g. Are those proto-stars in a nebula? Or is that some transcendent intelligence's weekend project or substrate or waste matter?
- gort 16y agoNature News: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101202/full/news.2010.645.html http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101202/full/news.2010.645.ht... [Edit] They are calling it a member of the Halomonadaceae, which means it is descended from the common ancestor of that group, and so does not represent a second, independant origin of life.
- amichail 16y agoWhy is this interesting at all if it is not an independent origin of life?
- gort 16y agoPhosphorous is used by all previously known life in a number of ways, including as part of the DNA backbone. If there's something that uses something else, it's a big deal.
- alexophile 16y agoIt's a proof-of-concept for radical new ideas of where/how life can form. For instance, Titan has a thick atmosphere and lakes of liquid ethane/methane. If Arsenic-based life exists, could there be Methane-based life in those depths?
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- Shamiq 16y agoThe issues may be different, but the doubt that is raised now in the one true way path of life are real.
- alexophile 16y agoRight, I guess 'methane-based life' was poor wording. Suffice it to say that this discovery implies that life can form in ways and places that we've never considered.
- mfukar 16y agoI knew they couldn't keep their mouth shut.
- T_S_ 16y agoIf it didn't use DNA I'd be even more impressed. It's great that they leaked it, though. My 9th graders' science class is going to tune in live, thanks to the leak. Good opportunity to make science seem timely and relevant to kids.
- ceejayoz 16y agoTechnically, it's not DNA, as it lacks the phosphate groups that are in DNA/RNA nucleotides.
- T_S_ 16y agoYour point is well-taken. I was reacting to the early hype that suggested these bugs may have originated completely independently of other life on earth. If the organism evolved to use arsenic as a replacement for phosphate in a DNA-like chemical, I'm not sure if the independent origins hypothesis is really warranted. The Nature summary I saw today did not mention anything like that. The nature of hype I guess.
- teilo 16y agoFrom everything I have read so far, it seems that this is not so much a case of life evolving separately, but rather a simple, albeit unique, case of natural selection. If a bacteria could evolve to tolerate arsenic, it could then use arsenic as a substitute for phosphorus. That appears to be the case with the Mono Lake species. Yes, it opens up the possible chemical signatures for life to be found elsewhere, but I would hardly call it "alien life".
- aditya 16y agoDepends on how you define "alien", right? Alien as in different from human, then this qualifies. Alien as in extraterrestrial (ie. not originating on Earth), then this doesn't. The bigger question, in my mind, is can you evolve a sentient species (in a few million years) from this microbe? And what would happen if we threw this microbe on Mars or Venus? Would natural selection allow it to thrive there?
- andreyf 16y agoI think I remember my dad telling me of this as theoretically possible in the early 90's (he's a biologist).
- psadauskas 16y agoPhil Plait on Bad Astronomy has a really good write-up about it, and why it matters to exobiology: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/02/nasas-real-news-bacterium-on-earth-that-lives-off-arsenic/ http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/02/na...
- jim_h 16y agoArticle from 2 years ago on the 'Arsenic-loving bacteria' http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/August/15080802.asp http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/August/15080802....
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoChoose your news source for this story: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962894 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962894 - go.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962893 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962893 - nytimes.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962846 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962846 - nature.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962696 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962696 - longislandpress.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962386 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962386 - gizmodo.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962200 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962200 - gizmodo.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962110 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1962110 - google.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1957823 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1957823 - skymania.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1953228 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1953228 - kottke.org
- bradfordw 16y agoYou can even follow ArsenicBacteria on the twitters.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoOfficial announcement: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1963296 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1963296
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]