3 ms·
This analogy is what snapped in half, not the hammer. It's more like if your hammer says right on it, "YOU NEED A SECOND HAMMER" and this is true of all hammer
by diminoten 8y ago
This analogy is what snapped in half, not the hammer. It's more like if your hammer says right on it, "YOU NEED A SECOND HAMMER" and this is true of all hammers, it's still not the hammer's fault you didn't bring a second hammer.
- Dylan16807 8y agoAnd you're in other threads complaining that the people that had five hammers were still doing it wrong, that all the outages they report are fake somehow... Even when you're supposed to have redundancy, there are still certain failure rates that are acceptable and some that are not. And redundancy doesn't solve every problem either.
- diminoten 8y agoWhat? No I'm not. Literally no where has anyone said they've built a system with redundancies as recommended by AWS and still had problems. Of course there are unacceptable failure rates. AWS doesn't have them, and pretending like they do is simply lying to yourself to protect your own ego.