3 ms·
YOLO, no! https://i.imgur.com/R1RZ2N0.png https://i.imgur.com/R1RZ2N0.png Jokes aside, we need better temporal consistency, especially when we start arming AI
by daenz 8y ago
YOLO, no! https://i.imgur.com/R1RZ2N0.png https://i.imgur.com/R1RZ2N0.png
Jokes aside, we need better temporal consistency, especially when we start arming AI. citizen -> citizen -> citizen -> armed insurgent
- yellowapple 8y agoWith that particular example, a citizen could very well also be an armed insurgent. Whether that citizen/insurgent is an ally or neutral or enemy is the distinction worth solving (even if it's significantly harder for an AI). Of course, that matters far less when Skynet decides that every human is a hostile armed insurgent...
- nan0 8y agoI am assuming that would be solved by having the AI also take in inputs of where your troops and allies are located. Perhaps with something like the Blue Force Tracker [0]. One of the first priorities of an operation is not knowing where your enemy is, but where you are. 0: https://www.viasat.com/products/blue-force-tracking-2 https://www.viasat.com/products/blue-force-tracking-2
- IshKebab 8y agoThe problem there isn't temporal consistency (although I agree that often sucks), it is over-reliance on context. The invisible sheep problem: http://aiweirdness.com/post/171451900302/do-neural-nets-dream-of-electric-sheep http://aiweirdness.com/post/171451900302/do-neural-nets-drea...