4 ms·
>DJB has not destroyed DNS. DJB didn't fork Bind and then refuse to work with them. >BoringSSL has not destroyed TLS BoringSSL didn't fork OpenSSL and then r
by tw04 8y ago
>DJB has not destroyed DNS.
DJB didn't fork Bind and then refuse to work with them.
>BoringSSL has not destroyed TLS
BoringSSL didn't fork OpenSSL and then refuse to work with them.
About the closest modern comparison would be OpenOffice vs. LibreOffice - which created a complete mess like I mentioned before.
Except even THAT is a bad comparison because LibreOffice only forked when they were FORCED to fork.
- floatingatoll 8y agoI was unable to parse this reply in the context of "do forks harm standards?" as we're discussing in this thread. What standard came to harm as a result of LibreOffice forking from OpenOffice?