3 ms·
In any case, that wouldn’t be google’s fault.
by taytus 8y ago
In any case, that wouldn’t be google’s fault.
- pbhjpbhj 8y agoDepends. If Google seek permission from the page owner and the owner warrants the fact that photos are licensed for AMP use, then it's all good. If Google don't bother, just assuming they have the rights, then they're infringers. In copyright law the distributor is usually down for the largest punishment, that would be Google. "I didn't bother to check if it was an infringement for me to distribute the work" doesn't seem like it would negate a claim of tortuous infringement?
- Retric 8y agoThey did check. Now, that’s not nessisarily enough but it is a defense.