4 ms·
This has the potential to create a huge legal headache. We can no longer rely on email to be there in our archive and presented as evidence in court, but now h
by wooptoo 8y ago
This has the potential to create a huge legal headache.
We can no longer rely on email to be there in our archive and presented as evidence in court, but now have to worry about expiry.
In many countries an exchange of emails which represents a series of terms, restrictions, an offer, and finally acceptance can be considered a legally binding contract between parties and can be presented in court.
With expiry and email DRM we now have entered the alternative reality of such contracts written with disappearing ink.
- krageon 8y agoIs this situation not the same as verbally binding legal contracts? What you need is to record your expiring messages otherwise it'll just devolve into a they said, they said in the courtroom.
- mc32 8y agoIf it’s from your org, vault keeps the records, if it’s from personal or outside gmail accounts those vaults should retain records. A court order could compel the other party to provide records. Of course this adds a complication but it’s not completely deleting the records everywhere.
- ovi256 8y ago>this adds a complication This increases the cost of access to justice so it reduces access to justice.
- gnode 8y agoI think the alternative reality we're entering is one where we cannot communicate without record. We coped in the past, where putting something in writing was the exception, not the default. As direct vocal communication becomes less common, it highlights the importance of being able to speak off-the-record. That said, these measures provide little guarantee of that.
- gibba999 8y agoDon't use expiring emails for that purpose. Seems simple enough.
- reaperducer 8y agoSeems simple to you and me. But there are plenty of non-technical bosses who will direct everyone in the company to only use expiring e-mails because they don't really understand the consequences.