3 ms·
But that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about available vaccines and none of them cause blindness. And the rates of death are far higher than 1%.
by tw04 8y ago
But that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about available vaccines and none of them cause blindness. And the rates of death are far higher than 1%. The probabilities involved are ridiculously in favor of vaccination. Literally the exact opposite of what you claim.
Making up completely ridiculous examples to just justify anti-vaxxer idiocy should stay on Facebook.
- irondruid 8y ago<< We're talking about available vaccines and none of them cause blindness. Quick Google Search: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22989339 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22989339
- chrisbennet 8y ago“Reversible blindness in bilateral optic neruritis associated with nasal flu vaccine.“ Reversable - the tiny chance of a reversable condition vs contributing to the death of others. Can you be more selfish?
- irondruid 8y agoPrevious comment 1) Burden of proof 2) Single cause You 1) Moving the goalposts 2) Illicit Major 3) Ad hominem https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies