3 ms·
Seems like scientists at that point have little choice but to bring legal action against those activists for slander. Unfortunately, and apropos of your point,
by Zelphyr 8y ago
Seems like scientists at that point have little choice but to bring legal action against those activists for slander. Unfortunately, and apropos of your point, most scientists likely won't be that aggressive in their action and I think the activists know it.
- smudgymcscmudge 8y agoI don’t think slander charges would work here unless the activists are lying about the scientists. Are there anti-harassment laws that could come into play? Much of the harassment probably crosses jurisdiction boarders, so it may be difficult to bring charges in many cases.
- robocat 8y ago> little choice but to bring legal action Huh? A legal campaign would severely escalate the problem, cost time and money, and prevent the scientists from doing their work. Besides, the international aspect of the issue: "TARGET: Oxford University professor Michael Sharpe" "INVESTIGATOR: David Tuller at his home in San Francisco": he blogs, sends hundreds of letters and emails, and travels the world giving speeches and holding meetings as supporters send him donations and praise for his CFS/ME campaign.