3 ms·
Going through the images, I shake my head in disbelief. So much of “art” is selling crap to the filthy rich, who have nothing better to do with their time or mo
by shiven 8y ago
Going through the images, I shake my head in disbelief. So much of “art” is selling crap to the filthy rich, who have nothing better to do with their time or money.
Maybe, I don’t “get” it. To each their own, I guess.
There is a business opportunity here, so it only makes sense that someone is exploiting it.
- maze-le 8y agoSome art is treated like an investment, it is speculated that the price of a piece is only going to go upwards. That is a reasonable assumption if the artist is famous, especially if the piece of art reflects a certain style or creative period. Usually it is very hard to copy the work/style of an artist. That said, I don't know how these pictures are going to hold to that assumption, since 'generative art' is by default reproductible and should be easy to copy...
- Retric 8y agoSome people actually like having multi million dollar paintings hanging up. But, the number of people that can afford to do so is relatively limited. Some as you say is pure speculation, but money laundering is also a significant part of the art world. Auctions regularly move vast sums of money between near anonymous people and represent highly portable wealth.
- dummyload 8y agoIt's basically a way to move money from one person to another, what's being transferred is money in lieu of art sale, art itself doesn't matter. Imagine, if you are a Mafia boss and you want 20M from businessman and you want to use this money for legitimate purpose like buying a real estate property or buying a business. What you do is, get some art and sell it an auction where your benefactor businessman is ready to bid, and that way money is transferred to your Mafia friend and it's all clean money at the end!
- bsenftner 8y ago"Art" with a capital "A" is much like religion: a pseudo-intellectual toy of possible conceptions and idealism. The big different between the fraud of Art and the fraud of religion is Art claims you can buy transcendence, whereas religion says you must give your soul and lively obedience for the potential of their idealism after death.
- afpx 8y agoI hope you don’t believe that about all art. Art is one of the pillars of Homo Sapien behavior, and it is found pretty much anywhere human settlements are found. I worry that many of us are becoming too distracted with life, logistics, and “productivity” to take time out to experience the things that make us human. Maybe that’s why art has become associated with the rich - maybe they’re the only ones who have time to enjoy it.
- asdkfjasl 8y agoI think it's a not uncommon view particularly about fine art as bought and sold in the galleries and auction houses of New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo.
- Hoasi 8y ago> I worry that many of us are becoming too distracted with life, logistics, and “productivity” to take time out to experience the things that make us human. True, but art as an industry created a bubble on its own. Nowadays it gives the perception that it is all about imposture and speculation.
- CyberDildonics 8y agoArt, yes. 100k painting with no cultural significance... that's probably more about rich idle hands or money laundering.