3 ms·
> It is the responsibility of car drivers not to hit softer things - full stop. I get the feeling a lot of people on HN have never actually driven a vehicle or
by dsfyu404ed 8y ago
> It is the responsibility of car drivers not to hit softer things - full stop.
I get the feeling a lot of people on HN have never actually driven a vehicle or at least haven't in recent memory. If you're driving through a street at a perfectly safe and reasonable speed a sufficiently stupid pedestrian is still perfectly capable of creating a situation that causes you to hit them. Nothing is foolproof. I'm sure I could get a truck driver who's doing nothing wrong to back over me if I behaved ignorantly enough.
Absolutes like "always the driver's faults are just stupid, ignorant, poorly thought out, whatever you want to call it but they sure aren't good.
It is every road user's ultimate responsibility to behave in a manner such that nobody else is forced to take emergency action to avoid them. The reason we have specific rules is so that people behave predictably (e.g. stopping at stop signs) making this easier.
I say this as someone who walks a couple miles through the city every day.
- seanmcdirmid 8y agoIn countries like China where the driver has more fault than a pedestrian and many aren’t following the rules (drivers and pedestrians), what winds up happening is that overall cruise speeds are greatly reduced and everyone is constantly on edge. I joke that the cars never really stop for you but everyone just slowly swerved out of each other’s way. It can work, it’s just less efficient.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]