Well, poor outcomes can certainly be attributed to poor direction from a CEO. Many of us have experienced that. My example is a new ceo who came in making a lot

Well, poor outcomes can certainly be attributed to poor direction from a CEO. Many of us have experienced that. My example is a new ceo who came in making a lot of noise about cleaning house and righting the ship. His intention was the sales org, but effectively scared off the best developers. He did also gut the sales org, and sales never recovered. So objectively it’s not out of the question the reverse could be true, that a ceo could influence a positive outcome, maybe just harder to measure?