3 ms·
>There's been recent success in the old school technique of 'striking'. All of those skilled jobs you speak of are full of people who don't understand what goo
by tw04 8y ago
>There's been recent success in the old school technique of 'striking'.
All of those skilled jobs you speak of are full of people who don't understand what good a union does. Literally complaining that a union is worthless while reaping the benefits and job stability that only a union can provide. I don't know if it's a matter of education or if people are really just going to have to experience for themselves how horrible the working world is/will become when there are no unions to protect them...
- mruts 8y agoThe market protects those who produce value. Unions are only of use to people who fail to produce increasing value and want to be paid for their stagnation.
- tw04 8y ago>The market protects those who produce value. This is a ridiculously juvenile view of how the world works. You need not look further than insert fortune 500 company who lays off highly paid sr. technical staff and replace them with jr. Claiming they provide no value to the company is asinine.
- kadendogthing 8y agoThere is absolutely zero evidence of this historically or presently.
- mruts 8y agoI make more money than a waitress. We both don't have unions. That's pretty good evidence, no?