3 ms·
if thats the correct interpretation than it should have been written as: "when what's good for the business may not be good for the public both as a whole and
by DoctorOetker 8y ago
if thats the correct interpretation than it should have been written as:
"when what's good for the business may not be good for the public both as a whole and as a set of individuals"
- ethbro 8y agoI guess a clearer analogy is via environmental economics and externalities. The byproduct of dominant market share in an industry where you influence people's thoughts is toxic responsibility. And currently, some large companies are avoiding and externalizing the costs of that responsibility.