note that my observation is not that the information contained is not "zero usefull information" but "not much usefull informmation". I certainly think a local

note that my observation is not that the information contained is not "zero usefull information" but "not much usefull informmation". I certainly think a local clock would be usefull, and contains very little information. But any large amount of information density is simply not supported by these observations due to simple wave aspects. A low information signal (for example highly predictable clock, or some other low frequency, high brain volume signal say perhaps a breathing rate not actually the breathing frequency) can still be important. I was only replying to the information processing comment