4 ms·
Oh yeah? Please expand on this, I'm curious. If that is your point of contention, you could replace "cannot work" by "may do more harm than good at a social le
by rscho 8y ago
Oh yeah? Please expand on this, I'm curious.
If that is your point of contention, you could replace "cannot work" by "may do more harm than good at a social level".
- krageon 8y agoI don't know what to expand on, as I don't understand how it wasn't clear from what I have already told you - can you indicate roughly where I stopped being clear?
- rscho 8y agoYou mentioned I said something very very wrong, but it's not clear to me if this is a language or fundamental issue. For instance if I say, as I have tried to enunciate above, "if herd immunity is too low, vaccines may do more harm than good at a social/epidemiologic level", does that still seem very very wrong to you? To be clear, your above comment gave the impression that you thought that a low herd immunity could not increase deaths due to disease compared to no herd immunity at all, which is wrong and was probably the reason why you were downvoted.