3 ms·
>What I am talking about is "doing you have the right know what's happening?" What that is printed on the back of a given label is a different matter, you think
by jdietrich 8y ago
>What I am talking about is "doing you have the right know what's happening?" What that is printed on the back of a given label is a different matter, you think?
The article we're discussing is about a change in USDA labelling requirements. I'm not really sure what you're talking about.
- joe_the_user 8y agoThe article described changes in description regulation but it wasn't about whether "pink slime" had to appear labels, since it never did appear to begin with - "finely textured beef" previously could be mixed with regular ground beef and not labeled. Not it's no longer classified as something different - where it seems reasonably clear this is a somewhat different product. And this change was essentially just the last push to stop any negative publicity surrounding this product, with the lawsuit again ABC looming prominently. And in the lawsuit, you have liable laws that give steep monetary damages for what we've discussed - pointing to details that are true and "icky" if arguably safe. Edit: Link to discussion of ABC liable trial from lead article. https://newfoodeconomy.org/heres-look-pink-slime-trial/ https://newfoodeconomy.org/heres-look-pink-slime-trial/ Smells very much of a SLAPP suit imo. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_publ...