5 ms·
I can't believe anyone would pay coin for that crap. Might as well get one year of the NYT crossword puzzles for the same price, it's a better value. Or randoml
by pointillistic 16y ago
I can't believe anyone would pay coin for that crap. Might as well get one year of the NYT crossword puzzles for the same price, it's a better value. Or randomly generate "I am having a coffee with my cat" in all possible combinations.
P.S. if this just a "display" does it mean there is no any value to the stale links?
- user24 16y agoif you're trying to train a system for sentiment analysis, it's quite a useful corpus.
- AndrewMoffat 16y agoone man's trash is another man's treasure :)
- sfphotoarts 16y agoThis is so wrong. There is enormous value in data when you aggregate so much. Even if everything is about cats that tells you lots of things. That the economy is is good shape for example, that people are having so little bad stuff going on that they can focus on lunch plans. You'd actually have to do work on the data to really see it's value. Even if you only used it to generate markov chains it's valuable. Entity extraction, sentiment, brand feedback, etc etc.
- sp4rki 16y agoYou missed the point of the whole thing. This is not about displaying tweets, it's about the ability of a analyzing trends, news, popularity, etc. via tweets. It's a huge deal to be able to get 50% (let alone 100%) of all the tweets on a given moment.
- steveklabnik 16y agoNot only is it not about displaying tweets, it's specifically disallowed: > Customers will only be allowed to analyze the messages, not display them