5 ms·
Yes it is. https://github.com/jhallen/joes-sandbox/tree/master/editor-perf https://github.com/jhallen/joes-sandbox/tree/master/editor-p...
by hsk0823 8y ago
Yes it is. https://github.com/jhallen/joes-sandbox/tree/master/editor-perf https://github.com/jhallen/joes-sandbox/tree/master/editor-p...
- jw14 8y agoAs an Atom user I wanted to try this because historically Atom has been worse than VS Code at large files. I don't have a 500k word text file laying around, but I tried an 80k line SQL script. FWIW, it's 8.5mb and the Atom wordcount plugin claims it's about 1.5 million "words". Atom opened this file in 3-4 seconds and memory usage only increased about 30mb. Navigation grinds to a halt with the wordcount plugin enabled. Once I disable its "always on" feature (normally it doesn't pay attention to .sql), navigation and editing seem snappy. Just a data point. VS Code should be able to get much better...
- marcosdumay 8y agoInteresting that nano has low performance overall. It's easy to understand (it's not an advanced editor), but I really didn't expect it. Also, notepad++ is all over the place.