4 ms·

Why would he have suspected Radcliffe of being a "face person"? He's not just "famous for being famous", he's famous for starring in an incredibly successful se

• noodle 16y ago
  because its most likely that you'll find a horde of kids willing to buy a magazine with his face on it. on the flip side of that coin, you'll find there's a horde of adults willing to buy a magazine with jobs or buffet on the cover, in a similar way.
• pbhjpbhj 16y ago
  >Why would he have suspected Radcliffe of being a "face person"? He's not just "famous for being famous", he's famous for starring in an incredibly successful series of movies. Being famous for being in a movie seems very close to being famous for being famous to me. When he was in the first Harry Potter movie Radcliffe was just a cute looking kid that could act a bit, they could have probably chosen from dozens of others and had a similar success. He was chosen almost certainly because his face fit the bill - he had the right look. He most definitely wouldn't have been chosen if he'd been ugly. So his fame, as opposed to someone else’s fame is largely IMO down to his face - certainly it's not down to his being a geek or his apparent intelligence. He was also helped by nepotism it seems. Now, he also appears to have taken well to his role and made the best of it and so his continued "stardom" and his career beyond the first Harry Potter is certainly laudable.