3 ms·
This sounds like standard title inflation, and it's not restricted to just technical ladders. It's certainly a problem, but I don't think we should discount the
by nilkn 8y ago
This sounds like standard title inflation, and it's not restricted to just technical ladders. It's certainly a problem, but I don't think we should discount the idea of principal engineering roles just because job titles can be misused or abused.
The company I'm at has a single principal engineer. He was hired externally. Within a year of starting, he'd had a bigger impact across teams than the CTO in the same time period. He doesn't necessarily write tons of code, but he's also not sitting in an ivory tower telling other developers what to do. Rather, he very quickly got in tune with the sorts of technical problems being faced by basically every team and developer at the company and started introducing various techniques and technologies to resolve pain points around the organization. Before long, we were doing things that wouldn't have even been possible before.
- 6ak74rfy 8y agoThis sounds like a great guy. Can you give some concrete examples of various techniques and technologies that he brought to the table?
- mixmastamyk 8y agoFew places are hitting 12 on the Joel Test twenty years on. That, unit/integration tests, and a "message bus" with metrics dashboards and you're above average.
- nambit 8y agoIf you need a principal engineer to tell you to write unit/integration tests, that speaks volumes about the quality of engineering below him.