4 ms·
That would be very problematic for selling ads, though.
by yyyymmddhhmmss 8y ago
That would be very problematic for selling ads, though.
- Ma8ee 8y agoThis is one reason why some of us choose to pay for journalism.
- cies 8y agoI paid and still saw ads, "advertorials" (disgusting), and verbatim copies of press releases + PR firm handouts. So I stopped paying. If someone can point me to proper news sites that give me quality paid news, please do so.
- ggm 8y agoYou won't like my answer. I pay for the guardian. It's proper news. I would pay for the Australian but I refuse to pay Murdoch press. I would strongly consider paying for the washpo or the economist.
- Chris2048 8y agoHow do you know it's "proper news"?
- ggm 8y agoHow does anyone know its proper news? Contextually I think it means from a newspaper which employs trained journalists and with an established editorial policy you can find on the web. Agreeing with it isn't the point btw.
- cies 8y agoWhy should I not like your answer? I like a lot from the Guardian, it was on my list actually. Thanks for your suggestion.