4 ms·
The QUIC protocol draft states that it's not an acronym: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16#section-1.2 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft
by winklock 8y ago
The QUIC protocol draft states that it's not an acronym:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16#section-1.2 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16#sec...
- BurnGpuBurn 8y agoThe original creator of quick also explicitly named it as an acronym [0]. But of course, if the big boys at IETF decree it's not an acronym, it isn't. Just like we've always been at war with Oceanea. [0] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-ev2jRFUoVD34/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqs...
- anticensor 8y agoPrescriptive language always falls apart from actual usage.
- IshKebab 8y agoWell they are wrong then.