5 ms·

A lot of subs are full of edgelords. The sub was quarantined because they need to make Reddit more palatable to investors and advertisers.

MRD85 8y ago
A lot of subreddits had that happen to them. It's sad because they are choosing who can speak and who cannot.
- rhizome 8y ago
  Perhaps interestingly, this is exactly what people criticize Twitter/Jack for not doing.
  - vonmoltke 8y ago
    The problem is, it's generally different people in those cases. These two groups are fundamentally opposed, and satisfying them both is impossible.
    - rhizome 8y ago
      You're right, when GP says "people want less X for Y" and I say "people want more X for Z," we aren't talking about the same "people."
- throwaway773321 8y ago
  Yeah like /r/theredpill
- deminature 8y ago
  They're not stopping those people from speaking, they're just hiding that content from average users. It's reasonable to think the average redditor probably doesn't want to see death videos alongside their cat pictures and memes.
  - pbhjpbhj 8y ago
    >"the average redditor probably doesn't want to see death videos alongside their cat pictures and memes" // Was that possible _by accident_ in recent renditions of reddit? IME you have to be in a reddit where that sort of content is, and change settings to make it default visible?
    - conception 8y ago
      /r/all potentially could have anything pop up, no?
      - pbhjpbhj 8y ago
        I could be wrong but it always (in my recollection, so only going back a few years) excluded nsfw? When I last visited even going to a fully nsfw subreddit all the media was blurred out, so you might have NSFL titles .. but if you're that timid then probably any site with UGC is going to be a struggle.
        twothumbsup 8y ago
        NSFW is not filtered out of /r/all; it is from /r/popular. AFAIK though subs have to opt-in to being part of /r/all.
        Bograff 8y ago
        It use to show up in my /r/all feed when NSFW filtering was off. Definitely stood out among the other NSFW content you would be scrolling past.
        slg 8y ago
        The binary SFW/NSFW designation is also a problem. First there is the difference between NSFW text and NSFW visuals. You will see plenty of text posts on Reddit labeled as NSFW because they include a dirty joke, talk about sex, or includes something incredibly un-PC. When it comes to visuals, there is a big difference with how comfortable people are with sex vs violence (NSFW/NSFL). Some people would be happy to see one but want to stay away from the other. Then you have the difference within those categories. A picture of a person in skimpy underwear is not the same thing as hardcore porn. Similarly a video of an athlete hyperextending their knee on a sports subreddit is different than the type of gore that you might see on the watchpeopledie subreddit mentioned above. Maybe you should be able to indicate the severity and category of the NSFW-ness. Potentially something similar to MPAA ratings were you can have PG-13, R, X with an indication if it is for sex, violence, or something else. However that puts even more work on the users/moderators which is probably why Reddit would never implement it.
- criley2 8y ago
  It's sad that people conflate posting on reddit with "speaking". From the American perspective: our love of and support for free speech means you can make your own website or newspaper and say what you want. (And people have the freedom, conversely, to tell you your content sucks and f you) But we never envisioned a world where some private newspaper would be forced to print the speech of those they didn't want to, or disagreed with. Considering the content of the VAST MAJORITY of quarantined subs (holocaust denial, virulent and shocking racism, white nationalism), it's actually shocking that Reddit allows this content to continue without banning. You say it's sad they are choosing who can speak and who cannot, but I can point you to objectively evil and noxious speech on reddit today that isn't going anywhere...
yesco 8y ago
You're definitely right about this, the fact that even /r/4chan isn't quarantined despite the content of it's comment section tells you everything you need to know. WPD had very strict rules imposed before the quarantine occurred and the comments weren't nearly as bad as one would expect. Frankly I think it's obvious that the entire point of quarantines is to hide away the content Reddit doesn't want advertisers to see without any community blowback. Quarantined subreddits are completely ad-free after all.
- maceurt 8y ago
  I remember just last year r/4chan literally had a picture of an overweight woman drinking a big gulp getting fucked doggy style by a man covered in blood with a caption "I have evolved" as the background to their subreddit. 4chan regularly got to the frontpage of reddit and many posts were not marked nsfw. Reddit should have done something about that subreddit years ago, because that could actually turn new users off of reddit.
  - joejerryronnie 8y ago
    Big Gulps are very disturbing. I mean, why would you not just spend the extra 10 cents for a Super Big Gulp?

MRD85 8y ago

A lot of subreddits had that happen to them. It's sad because they are choosing who can speak and who cannot.

rhizome 8y ago
Perhaps interestingly, this is exactly what people criticize Twitter/Jack for not doing.
- vonmoltke 8y ago
  The problem is, it's generally different people in those cases. These two groups are fundamentally opposed, and satisfying them both is impossible.
  - rhizome 8y ago
    You're right, when GP says "people want less X for Y" and I say "people want more X for Z," we aren't talking about the same "people."
throwaway773321 8y ago
Yeah like /r/theredpill
deminature 8y ago
They're not stopping those people from speaking, they're just hiding that content from average users. It's reasonable to think the average redditor probably doesn't want to see death videos alongside their cat pictures and memes.
- pbhjpbhj 8y ago
  >"the average redditor probably doesn't want to see death videos alongside their cat pictures and memes" // Was that possible _by accident_ in recent renditions of reddit? IME you have to be in a reddit where that sort of content is, and change settings to make it default visible?
  - conception 8y ago
    /r/all potentially could have anything pop up, no?
    - pbhjpbhj 8y ago
      I could be wrong but it always (in my recollection, so only going back a few years) excluded nsfw? When I last visited even going to a fully nsfw subreddit all the media was blurred out, so you might have NSFL titles .. but if you're that timid then probably any site with UGC is going to be a struggle.
      - twothumbsup 8y ago
        NSFW is not filtered out of /r/all; it is from /r/popular. AFAIK though subs have to opt-in to being part of /r/all.
      - Bograff 8y ago
        It use to show up in my /r/all feed when NSFW filtering was off. Definitely stood out among the other NSFW content you would be scrolling past.
      - slg 8y ago
        The binary SFW/NSFW designation is also a problem. First there is the difference between NSFW text and NSFW visuals. You will see plenty of text posts on Reddit labeled as NSFW because they include a dirty joke, talk about sex, or includes something incredibly un-PC. When it comes to visuals, there is a big difference with how comfortable people are with sex vs violence (NSFW/NSFL). Some people would be happy to see one but want to stay away from the other. Then you have the difference within those categories. A picture of a person in skimpy underwear is not the same thing as hardcore porn. Similarly a video of an athlete hyperextending their knee on a sports subreddit is different than the type of gore that you might see on the watchpeopledie subreddit mentioned above. Maybe you should be able to indicate the severity and category of the NSFW-ness. Potentially something similar to MPAA ratings were you can have PG-13, R, X with an indication if it is for sex, violence, or something else. However that puts even more work on the users/moderators which is probably why Reddit would never implement it.
criley2 8y ago
It's sad that people conflate posting on reddit with "speaking". From the American perspective: our love of and support for free speech means you can make your own website or newspaper and say what you want. (And people have the freedom, conversely, to tell you your content sucks and f you) But we never envisioned a world where some private newspaper would be forced to print the speech of those they didn't want to, or disagreed with. Considering the content of the VAST MAJORITY of quarantined subs (holocaust denial, virulent and shocking racism, white nationalism), it's actually shocking that Reddit allows this content to continue without banning. You say it's sad they are choosing who can speak and who cannot, but I can point you to objectively evil and noxious speech on reddit today that isn't going anywhere...

yesco 8y ago

You're definitely right about this, the fact that even /r/4chan isn't quarantined despite the content of it's comment section tells you everything you need to know. WPD had very strict rules imposed before the quarantine occurred and the comments weren't nearly as bad as one would expect. Frankly I think it's obvious that the entire point of quarantines is to hide away the content Reddit doesn't want advertisers to see without any community blowback. Quarantined subreddits are completely ad-free after all.

maceurt 8y ago
I remember just last year r/4chan literally had a picture of an overweight woman drinking a big gulp getting fucked doggy style by a man covered in blood with a caption "I have evolved" as the background to their subreddit. 4chan regularly got to the frontpage of reddit and many posts were not marked nsfw. Reddit should have done something about that subreddit years ago, because that could actually turn new users off of reddit.
- joejerryronnie 8y ago
  Big Gulps are very disturbing. I mean, why would you not just spend the extra 10 cents for a Super Big Gulp?