3 ms·

I think that the parent commenter is referencing node 4.3 being past EOL and being unmaintained software and therefore unfit for prod, unlike the ms stack which

I think that the parent commenter is referencing node 4.3 being past EOL and being unmaintained software and therefore unfit for prod, unlike the ms stack which is receiving patches

akoncius 8y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework_version_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework_version_history begs to differ.
- marvy 8y ago
  node, not .net
  - akoncius 8y ago
    I was referring to comments that MS is good at backwards compatibility and “if you write application, it will run forever” and I pointed out that MS also breaks backward compatibility what regards languages.