3 ms·
I agree that mobile and search were missteps, specifically putting themselves into a position of competing so poorly in those areas overall. It's also unrealist
by adventured 8y ago
I agree that mobile and search were missteps, specifically putting themselves into a position of competing so poorly in those areas overall. It's also unrealistic to think that one company could own desktop, mobile, search, office, etc.
Microsoft was going to own desktop, mobile, search? $300-$400 billion in revenue? $130+ billion in profit?
No. That's absurd. Holding Ballmer to account for not conquering planet Earth is not a fair premise. Of course there were lots of 'missteps,' what's described is impossible. Their biggest mistake was attempting all of it in the first place.
- twblalock 8y ago> Microsoft was going to own desktop, mobile, search? $300-$400 billion in revenue? $130+ billion in profit? > No. That's absurd. Holding Ballmer to account for not conquering planet Earth is not a fair premise. I didn't say Microsoft needed to "own" mobile and search. They just needed to be competitive, instead of trying and failing which is what they did.
- btowngar 8y agoOnline search is a natural monopoly - being simply "competitive" probably isn't possible, you either win (Google) or you don't (everybody else).