3 ms·
I certainly don’t mean to discount the importance of metadata. I specifically mentioned ensuring Signal fits your threat model. To suggest that metadata of com
by bronco21016 8y ago
I certainly don’t mean to discount the importance of metadata. I specifically mentioned ensuring Signal fits your threat model.
To suggest that metadata of communication over Signal between my spouse and I will be used against my grand kids one day is a bit absurd though. Of course there’s tons of metadata connecting my spouse and I. It would be more suspicious if there wasn’t.
- e12e 8y agoSpouse, "family" and friends are different goalposts. Mapping friends and family is AFAIK a key part of who gets bombed by the cia. Sure, if your spouse is found to be an "enemy of the state" under a new totalitarian government - your immediate family will have problems. If a friend turns out to be union organizer, you might be banned from jobs, if the government decides to collude with employers (again).