42 ms·
You're right. But when a government is involved, you cannot even start explaining to `the business` they have flawed logic. (Believe me, I've tried... and faile
by toolslive 8y ago
You're right. But when a government is involved, you cannot even start explaining to `the business` they have flawed logic. (Believe me, I've tried... and failed)
- Aeolun 8y agoWhen a business with multiple layers of management is involved it also quickly becomes impossible. “It was decided!” “By whom? Why?” “???, It was decided!” “...”
- bluGill 8y agoIt was decided over dozens of meetings with dozens of people, and there are not good notes. Those people are smart and considered more details than you did (but not always the same details). There is rightly fear that if we reconsider this again we will forget one of those other details and some up with a decision that is better for your case but worse overall because it breaks some other case.
- toolslive 8y agoIsn't it more likely they just keep on adding little exceptions in order to be able to show they pushed something through for their constituents? That's the impression I got when reading these laws in the first place (a bone for the liberals, a bone for the socialists, ....)
- bluGill 8y agoDepends. Sometimes things work that way, sometimes they do not. It depends on how much attention the extras would bring.
- pc86 8y agoIsn't this is a feature, not a bug? When things are decided by a democratically elected body you don't necessarily want a contractor coming in and tweaking things "because this is a better way."