4 ms·
No they're not (and not they don't). Snacks are inanimate objects that can't lead anyone to anything. People abusing snacks lead themselves to bad eating habits
by stronglikedan 8y ago
No they're not (and not they don't). Snacks are inanimate objects that can't lead anyone to anything. People abusing snacks lead themselves to bad eating habits.
- BoiledCabbage 8y agoCyanide is bad for you and can lead to death. "No it's not, it's an inanimate object..."
- stronglikedan 8y agoYou are correct, but it's still not a valid comparison.
- nradov 8y agoYou're technically correct, but real humans are subject to temptation and have limited willpower. I don't think it's a great idea for employers to make it convenient for employees with sedentary jobs to eat more.
- stronglikedan 8y agoI don't think it's a great idea for me to lose a perk that I enjoy because some people are subject to temptation and have limited willpower. Those types of people would just bring in their own snacks if they weren't available oh, so I don't see the problem with the employer providing them to those who consider them a perk. I'm sure some of the more frugal employees would save a lot at the grocery store by sticking to the free snacks provided.
- IWeldMelons 8y agoYou must be a libertatrian.
- stronglikedan 8y agoYou must make a lot of unsubstantiated assumptions.
- IWeldMelons 8y agoYou have no sense of humor.