3 ms·
I feel like there should be a more reasonable middle ground between 3+-year-old software and cutting-edge?
by mehrdadn 8y ago
I feel like there should be a more reasonable middle ground between 3+-year-old software and cutting-edge?
- raxxorrax 8y agoTrue, there probably is, but Debian is pretty known to be conservative towards newer releases.
- mehrdadn 8y agoIs there any distribution besides Arch that isn't like this? Alpine is also pretty bad about this, and I haven't tried other distros in years.
- raxxorrax 8y agoNo idea. I use mainly Debian but I think Ubuntu has a more aggressive update policy and is based on Debian. Not sure about RH since I don't know a lot about their package managers. But CentOS and Fedora are probably also quite up to date.
- mehrdadn 8y agoOh Ubuntu is like Debian to me... in fact when I was taking about Debian this whole time I was actually talking about Ubuntu. Its latexmk is the one that's old.
- chupasaurus 8y agoMost of the big maintaining teams (programming languages and DEs) are the same for both distributions.
- catern 8y agoI find Nix is pretty up to date, and helpfully you can use it on top of any distro.