3 ms·
Excellent find! I was really puzzled what a "Class 1 infrared camera" was, but it makes perfect sense to have a Class 1 laser[1] with an infrared camera to pi
by gvb 16y ago
Excellent find!
I was really puzzled what a "Class 1 infrared camera" was, but it makes perfect sense to have a Class 1 laser[1] with an infrared camera to pick up the spots. This also makes a lot more sense for detecting distance via triangulation: discrete spots are going to be much easier to triangulate than doing a two-camera vision system, e.g. detect unpredictable edges, correlate the two cameras' edges, and determine distance.
The hologram projection concept makes a lot of sense. A full scanning laser would be prohibitively expensive. A hologram projection would be robust and cheap, but less accurate and require much more software processing.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_safety#Class_1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_safety#Class_1
- gvb 16y agoOn further thought, I over-thought that. Parallax calculations aren't necessary. Since the points will be projected at an angle, the distance to the object being painted ("spotted") is going to be directly proportional to the distance between spots.
- joezydeco 16y agoLooking at the datasheet for the PrimeSense reference system that Microsoft used, it does mention a "registration image" and a laser: http://www.primesense.com/?p=514 http://www.primesense.com/?p=514