3 ms·
I guess, but he's just representing his client (albeit a reprehensible client). The DOJ appointees who passed on prosecuting felony charges are indistinguishab
by jgalt212 8y ago
I guess, but he's just representing his client (albeit a reprehensible client). The DOJ appointees who passed on prosecuting felony charges are indistinguishable from corrupt cops.
- krageon 8y agoThere is no "just" here. He is representing a monstrous client and that is something he can and should be held responsible for.
- deogeo 8y agoThere's a difference between legal advice and representation in a court of law (which I fully support no matter how bad the accusations), and back-room political dealing.