I could see the point in clarifying something like that where an important event is in dispute. Unfortunately this covers things that no sane organization shou

I could see the point in clarifying something like that where an important event is in dispute. Unfortunately this covers things that no sane organization should feel a need to clarify as a fact. I can understand why a person may want to debate these facts, but I think a sensible organization would let many of these things go: " It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange bleaches his hair. It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange’s mother is, or ever was, a “hippie”. It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a “hacker”. " It just sounds a little kooky.