3 ms·
Which, to be clear, seems entirely justifiable because software rendering exists. If Nvidia wants their cards to work well on an all-free-software stack, they
by geofft 8y ago
Which, to be clear, seems entirely justifiable because software rendering exists.
If Nvidia wants their cards to work well on an all-free-software stack, they can provide a free software driver. If users care about making an unofficial driver work, they can do the work or fund the work. Chrome is just trying to get web pages on the screen and it doesn't seem like it's worth the boil-the-ocean level of effort of taking responsibility for implementing a reverse-engineered graphics driver when they can just get web pages on the screen using software rendering.
- Aeolun 8y agoAs far as I understood they could get pages on the screen even with the nouveau driver.
- chrismeller 8y agoThat's the part that I don't understand. The bug report says on Linux the same rendering is used for the UI as well as the page content... but only the UI was ever having a problem? Something doesn't add up to me there, and no one that I saw ever addressed that in more detail.